DNA TESTING COMPANIES ADMIT TAMPERING WHITE PROFILES’ DNA

DNA TESTING COMPANIES ADMIT TAMPERING WHITE PROFILES TO ‘SCREW WITH RACISTS’

23andMe & Ancestry adding fake African ancestry to white customer profiles

Yeah, it’s a WTF?! moment…..

https://www.infowars.com/dna-testing-companies-admit-tampering-white-profiles-to-screw-with-racists/

Saw this today, and well, while I was not surprised; still felt the need to inform more people on this matter. I hope posting this here will do just that. Will you see this on the MSM?? I don’t know. So much of what “really” goes on in the world these days is perverted, and spun another direction. And, thereby giving people “bad” info. Sad, but that’s the way it is. We have to look further into the news we hear and even then, discern it. Dissect it. And prove it a truth or not.

What I’d like to see is for these companies to show how many people of color, have white or European blood running through their veins. (PS: No I’m not what the world calls “rasist”) But I do believe if you want to know your history or lineage then the truth must be told and regardless of how you feel or what you wish it would be, acceptance of a truth is key to moving forward and maybe even excelling to higher grounds and ideas. Who knows, it just might be a blessing to know you aren’t who you thought you were.

With people/companies like ancestry, fixing the game, well…might be best we not know- unless we can get at the truth. No one wants to be lied to, especially if you paid big money to see accurate results.

 

Advertisements

TIPS FOR SURVIVING MARTIAL LAW

I was recently sent a link to this page; thought it might (in the near future) be helpful. And, that’s what it’s all about……helping one another. At the end of the day, it’s us against them, isn’t that how it is in many situations. Praise God there are more of us then them. And we are smarter (no pride implied) and more determined both for us and our families- WE TRUST GOD AND WE LOVE ONE ANOTHER. With that said, please enjoy these links:

http://www.apesurvival.com/tips-for-surviving-martial-law/

Just What is Martial Law ? >https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Martial_law

Just What is a False Flag ? > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_flag

 

*shared links

Trust Jesus; He’ll tell you where to go and what to do when the time is right. Be listening! “Greater is He in us than he that is in the world.’

This Video Blessed Me

*I wasn’t going to post this video, mainly due to it’s length (2 hours). I’m retired and since I had some extra time tonight (me and my wife were sitting up tending to her aged mother), well…I saw a movie earlier; maybe time now for a curious lesson. I had bookmarked it weeks ago, and had only finished it two-thirds the way, but what I saw in this video, something I’ve been researching for a long time now, well…had to come back to it. And I tell you, when I started it, I didn’t want to stop it- but hey! Life happens and I have bookmarks…I will return another day. And, I did. Finished it just now, and the end message inspired me to post it here. I hope you will watch it all the way through. TAKE DAYS to do it, but see it through. I don’t know if the evil of the world will ever end, it’s evil…of course, not without Divine intervention…but the idea at the end sounds somewhat affective to some degrees.

Anyway, before it gets taken down @ the u tuber place, watch it, down load it and share this valuable facts and truths and encourage others to at least be open to what’s presented…because it’s true. Why are we here? There are many reasons why we are here…too lengthy to get into. We each have similar jobs from High Above, but maybe, just maybe it’s to share what’s presented in this video. If it was Christian oriented to the max, it would make a great witnessing tool…………..maybe it does anyway. I believe all truths come from God, and while the world will continue in evil and get much worse, maybe we can continue to inspire one another to, as the video implies and encourages “treat others better than we treat ourselves.” It’s not THE answer, but it’s a start. The video encourages us- God, commands us. You decide what to do with this video- Pray about it. Enjoy the video. 🙂  -Moraldiplomat

Armed By Law

*”It’s sad to say that weapons will always be in the hands of criminals. Time can attest to that. However, with an armed and skilled public, when the “crazies” attempt to use their bad judgment, an armed public will be there to see that order and safety remain. Police are good at their jobs for the most part, but they cannot be everywhere they need to be in a millisecond, and that’s all a criminal needs to change history. It’s been proven when a criminal thinks people around him are armed, he/ she is less likely to engage, and thereby resulting in his/her own demise.

An armed people keeps the other guy’s weapon holstered. History has shown that “gun control” only limits the actions of society to act when part of it’s society is acting out. I understand restrictions are needed, but so are weapons- guns save lives. Sadly they also take lives. It’s at present a necessary evil. But as being armed we must use good sense and knowing that once we draw down and fire, there is no take-backs. Can you imagine a society where only the police and criminals are armed? And finally, what if a military foreign or domestic was to endanger you or your family? Who but an armed person could stand with you against such tyranny? And lest we forget, law enforcement has it’s good people, but so many now have fallen victim to “trigger happy ” and possibly scared cops. We don’t need these undetected and unskilled-judgment police shooting our loved ones unnecessarily- stay armed, stay safe and have faith.” -Moraldiplomat

Our country’s Founders, though at odds with each other about many matters, were united in their belief that private citizens, armed with their own firearms, were vital to a free nation.

Anti-Federalist icon Patrick Henry, in his famous “give me liberty or give me death” address to Virginia’s Second Revolutionary Convention on March 23, 1775, underscored the importance of an armed citizenry when he declared:

“They tell us … we are weak-unable to cope with so formidable an adversary [as the British]. But when shall we be stronger? Will it be when we are totally disarmed, and when a British guard shall be stationed in every house? Three million people, armed in the holy cause of liberty … are invincible by any force which our enemy can send against us.”

The Census Bureau estimates that the population of the colonies in 1700 was 2.1 million, and that by 1780 it reached 2.9 million. Henry’s reference in 1775 to “three million people, armed in the holy cause of liberty” clearly encompassed all competent citizens, not merely those qualified by age and gender for militia service.

Years later, when the Constitution was considered, Henry further expressed his unequivocal support of the individual right to keep and bear arms. During Virginia’s ratification convention he objected to the omission of a clause in the proposed Constitution that would forbid the disarming of individual citizens (the Second Amendment was adopted to solve that problem). “The great object,” he declared, “is that every man be armed…. Everyone who is able may have a gun.”

Thomas Paine, who voiced the colonists’ demands for freedom in his famous pamphlet Common Sense (1776), wrote in an earlier essay entitled “Thoughts on Defensive War” (1775):

“The supposed quietude of a good man allures the ruffian; while on the other hand, arms like laws discourage and keep the invader and the plunderer in awe, and preserve order in the world as well as property.”

And in The Federalist, No. 28, Alexander Hamilton stated: “If the representatives of the people betray their constituents, there is no recourse left but in the exertion of that original right of self-defense which is paramount to all positive forms of government.”

In essay 29 of The Federalist, Hamilton further observed that “little more can reasonably be aimed at with respect to the people at large than to have them properly armed and equipped,” since “this will not only lessen the calls for military establishments, but if circumstances should at any time oblige the government to form an army of any magnitude that army an never be formidable to the liberties of the people while there is a large body of citizens, little if at all inferior to hem in discipline and the use of arms, who stand ready to defend their rights and those of their fellow citizens.”

In a similar spirit, James Madison pointed out in The Federalist, No. 46, that “notwithstanding the military establishments in the several kingdoms of Europe, which are carried as far as the public resources will bear, the governments are afraid to trust the people with arms,” since, were the people armed and organized into militia, “the throne of every tyranny in Europe would be speedily overturned in spite of the legions which surround it.”

On June 18, 1789, 10 days after James Madison proposed the Bill of Rights in the House of Representatives, Tench Coxe, a Federalist and friend of Madison, published in Philadelphia’s Federal Gazette (under the pen name “A Pennsylvanian”) what Steven Halbrook describes as “probably the most complete exposition of the Bill of Rights to be published during its ratification period.”

Coxe’s analysis included this comment: “As civil rulers, not having their duty to the people duly before them, may attempt to tyrannize, and as the military forces which must be occasionally raised to defend our country, might pervert their power to the injury of their fellow citizens, the people are confirmed by the next article in their right to keep and bear their private arms.” “In short,” Halbrook states, “what is now the Second Amendment was designed to guarantee the right of the people to have ‘their private arms’ to prevent tyranny and to overpower an abusive standing army or select militia [such as today’s National Guard].”

It is worth noting that Coxe sent a copy of his article, with a cover letter, to Madison, and that the father of the Constitution expressed no objection to his comments. Rather than disagreeing that the proposed amendment protected the possession and use of “private arms,”

Madison stated in his reply that ratification of the entire package of amendments “will however be greatly favored by explanatory strictures of a healing tendency, and is therefore already indebted to the co-operation of your pen.” Halbrook points out that a “search of the literature of the time reveals that no writer disputed or contradicted Coxe’s analysis that became what the Second Amendment protected.

Always Safe, Always Prepared

Credit write up by: Frank M.
*Thanks Frank

BONUS VIDEO